When a client decides to make a significant charitable gift, the instinct is often to write a check. It feels straightforward, and for smaller gifts it usually is. But for clients holding long-term appreciated securities, cash is frequently the less efficient way to give. Selling the stock first, paying capital gains tax, and donating what’s left often leaves less on the table, both for the charity and for the client’s own tax return, than donating the shares directly.

For CPAs and wealth advisors, recognizing when this applies, and explaining it clearly, can meaningfully change the after-tax cost of a client’s philanthropy.

A note on the numbers below: the core strategy of donating appreciated stock rather than cash is durable and has held up across many years of tax law changes. The specific AGI percentages, floors, and caps referenced later in this article reflect rules current as of mid-2026. Charitable deduction rules are set by statute and are revised periodically, so confirm the exact figures against current IRS guidance or Publication 526 before relying on them in a client conversation.

Why Donating the Stock Directly Can Be More Efficient 

When a client donates long-term appreciated stock directly to a qualified public charity or donor-advised fund, two things happen at once.

First, the client can generally deduct the fair market value of the stock at the time of the gift, not the original cost basis, provided the shares have been held for more than one year. Second, because the shares are given rather than sold, the client never realizes the capital gain, and neither they nor the charity owes capital gains tax on the appreciation. The charity, as a tax-exempt entity, can sell the stock without triggering a tax event at all.

Compare that to the alternative: the client sells the stock, pays long-term capital gains tax (potentially plus the 3.8% net investment income tax for higher earners), and donates the after-tax proceeds. The deduction is smaller because there’s less cash left to give, and the client has paid tax that a direct stock gift would have avoided entirely. For a client with substantial embedded gains, this difference can be significant.

A Simple Way to Frame It for Clients

The way to make this concrete for a client is to walk through both paths side by side using their actual numbers: original purchase price, current value, and their marginal tax rates. Once a client sees that donating shares directly avoids capital gains tax altogether, while selling first hands a portion of that same value to the IRS before the gift is even made, the appreciated-stock option tends to be an easy decision. The larger the embedded gain relative to the position’s current value, the more pronounced the advantage.

This is also a useful moment to confirm the holding period. Only long-term holdings, generally those held more than one year, qualify for a fair-market-value deduction. Short-term appreciated stock is deductible only at cost basis, which usually erases the advantage over giving cash. This distinction is easy for a client to overlook and worth confirming before recommending the strategy.   

Where the AGI Limits Come In

Deductions for charitable gifts are capped as a percentage of adjusted gross income, and the ceiling differs by asset type: cash gifts to public charities are subject to a higher limit than gifts of appreciated long-term capital gain property, such as stock, and gifts of appreciated property to a private foundation are capped lower still, with publicly traded stock treated as a narrower exception. Any amount that exceeds the applicable limit in a given year generally isn’t lost outright; current rules allow it to be carried forward for a set number of years.

Because the appreciated-property limit is lower than the cash limit, advisors and clients sometimes assume cash must be the more efficient gift. In practice, the lower AGI ceiling does not necessarily make cash the more efficient gift. For a donor with substantial embedded gains, the avoided capital gains tax on a direct stock gift can still make appreciated securities the more attractive option, depending on the client’s overall tax situation. The exact percentages are set by statute and have shifted before, so treat the specific figures as a snapshot rather than a fixed rule, and confirm the current limits against IRS Publication 526 or a current professional resource before applying them to a client’s numbers.

Recent Changes Worth Flagging

Tax legislation affecting charitable deductions has changed more than once in recent years, and it will likely change again. Two developments are worth building into any current conversation about charitable strategy, with the understanding that the specifics should be reverified at the time of the conversation.

As of this writing, itemized charitable deductions are only counted once they exceed a small floor tied to the taxpayer’s AGI. This kind of floor doesn’t eliminate the benefit of appreciated stock gifts, but it does mean very small annual gifts may see a diminished tax benefit, which is one reason bunching several years of giving into a single year, often through a donor-advised fund, has become a more common strategy.

Separately, current law also caps the effective value of itemized deductions, including charitable deductions, for taxpayers in the top bracket. This reduces the after-tax benefit of large gifts for the highest earners relative to prior rules, which is part of why some advisors accelerate major gifts ahead of anticipated changes.

Neither of these mechanics undermines the core logic of donating appreciated stock over cash. But because both the AGI limits and these newer provisions are creatures of statute, not fixed principles, the numbers deserve a fresh check for every client conversation rather than being carried forward from memory or from an earlier version of this article.

A Note on Documentation

Gifts of appreciated stock require their own documentation. Form 8283 is generally required when a taxpayer claims more than $500 in total noncash charitable contributions. Publicly traded securities are typically exempt from the qualified-appraisal requirement because market quotations are readily available, even when the value exceeds $5,000. The client’s brokerage and the receiving charity or DAF sponsor still need clear instructions and enough lead time to complete the transfer correctly.  A stock gift that gets processed as a sale-then-donation by mistake, rather than a direct transfer of shares, can quietly erase the entire tax advantage.

Where QCDs Fit for IRA Owners

For clients age 70½ or older with traditional IRA assets, a qualified charitable distribution is a separate but related tool worth mentioning in the same conversation. A QCD lets the client direct funds from an IRA straight to a qualifying charity, excluding that amount from taxable income entirely, up to an annually indexed limit. It isn’t the same mechanism as an appreciated stock gift, and it isn’t available for gifts to donor-advised funds, but for the right client it can be an even more direct way to reduce taxable income while giving.

The Advisor’s Role

Most clients don’t think about the tax mechanics of how they give, only about the cause they want to support. That’s exactly why this conversation is worth having proactively. A client sitting on a highly appreciated position, especially one they’ve been reluctant to sell because of the tax hit, may not realize that a charitable gift is one of the few ways to unwind that position without ever paying the capital gains tax on it. Flagging that opportunity before year-end, and before the client defaults to writing a check, is often the difference between a good gift and a more efficient charitable gift.

As with any strategy involving tax law, verify current AGI limits, floors, caps, and QCD indexed amounts before advising a specific client, since these figures are set by statute and subject to change.

This content is provided for general educational purposes only and does not constitute tax, legal, or financial advice. Figures, limits, and rules referenced are current as of the publication date and are subject to change. Please consult a qualified tax or legal professional before applying this information to a specific client situation.

About the Author: Jacqueline Roche

Jacqueline Roche is the Marketing and Communications Manager at Pinellas Community Foundation, connecting donors and nonprofits through strategic storytelling and engagement to drive community impact.